Skip to main content

Dear Hong Kong

Chloe Cheung is born and raised in Hong Kong. She joined the city’s pro-democracy movement when she was 14 years old during the 2019 protests, before going into exile in 2020 to continue her advocacy abroad. On December 24, 2024, the Hong Kong authorities placed a HK$1 million bounty on her because of her U.K. activism.

In a letter to her hometown, she writes about freedom, political prisoners and about the books that made her who she is. The letter is published in collaboration with Tomorrow Club.

Credits Text by Chloe Cheung April 19 2026

Dear Hong Kong,

You once taught me that freedom was ordinary. Now, even love for you has become a crime. I miss you. But missing you is not the same as forgiving what has been done to you.

I am writing from 6,000 miles away, from the same planet, under the same sky. Geography tells us we are far apart, but politics tells us we are closer than ever. Close enough that your laws reach me. Distant enough that I can’t go home.

I can't return to you. Not because I stopped loving you, but because loving you has been criminalised.

I am a Hong Kong activist in exile. That is not a metaphor. It is a legal and political fact. I am one of thousands who have been forced out and hunted abroad, because Hong Kong is no longer a city that tolerates dissent. It is now a city ruled by fear.

I loved the Hong Kong that raised me with the idea that freedom was commonplace. Speaking up was expected rather than courageous. That the rule of law meant something real, not something that was printed on banners for investors while judges read from scripts that said otherwise. I loved a city where protest was a civic act, not a security threat. Where journalists were watchdogs, not defendants. Where being political did not mean preparing for prison.

That Hong Kong taught me who I am. It also taught me what I am now being punished for.

Since 2019, you have been systematically dismantled. Two million people marched peacefully against an extradition bill that would have allowed Hong Kongers to be sent to China’s party-controlled legal system. Two million, nearly one in three people. That was not chaos, that was consent withdrawn.

The response was not dialogue. It was repression. Police violence became routine. Peaceful protesters were met with batons, tear gas, and rubber bullets. On June 30, 2020, the National Security Law was imposed on Hong Kong by Beijing without consultation, without legislative scrutiny, without democratic mandate. Overnight, speech became evidence and organisation became conspiracy.

Since then, more than 1,900 political arrests have been made. Independent media outlets, including Apple Daily and Stand News, have been forced to shut down. Opposition political parties have been dismantled. Civil society organisations and NGOs have been erased. School curricula have been rewritten to enforce political loyalty, replacing critical thinking with so-called “patriotic education.”

And I hate that this happened in your name.

I hate that your skyline is now used as a backdrop for propaganda. I hate that the international community speaks of you as a “financial hub” first and a human rights disaster second. I hate that some still describe you as a rule of law city instead of calling it what it is.

But hatred is not where I stop. Because I have not forgotten the lives still bound to your streets.

I think of Jimmy Lai.

A 78-year-old man. A publisher. A political prisoner. He founded Apple Daily, one of the last openly pro-democracy newspapers in Hong Kong. For that, his newsroom was raided, his paper forced to close, his assets frozen and he has been sentenced to 20 years in prison. He has been denied bail, denied medical care, denied basic dignity. His “crime” is not violence. It is belief. Belief that Hong Kong people deserved the truth.

I think of the Hong Kong 47.

Forty-seven people charged with “subversion” for organising and participating in a pro-democracy primary election. More than 600,000 Hong Kongers voted in that primary. That number matters. It proves legitimacy. It proves that the public wanted representation. For that, 45 of them were convicted. Some sentenced to up to 10 years in prison. Not for overthrowing the state. Not for violence. But for trying to win seats in a legislature that no longer exists in any meaningful sense.

I think of the Hong Kong Alliance.

For more than three decades, the Alliance organised the annual June 4 vigil. Hundreds of thousands gathered in Victoria Park, candle in hand, remembering the Tiananmen massacre. It was one of the last mass commemorations on Chinese soil.

That memory was intolerable. So the Alliance was dismantled and its leaders arrested.

Chow Hang-tung refused to lie. She refused to cooperate with political prosecutions dressed up as regulatory enforcement. For that, she remains imprisoned. Lee Cheuk-yan and Albert Ho were silenced the same way.

They are not symbols by choice. They are symbols because the state needed examples.

Hong Kong is now a place where law is no longer a shield, but a weapon. Where courts are used to legitimise outcomes decided in advance. Where “patriots only” elections guarantee that no one speaks for the people except those approved by power.

Exile has then become the price of conscience. That activists are forced to choose between silence and safety. That transnational repression now follows us abroad through threats, bounties, and intimidation.

Sadly, the world has learned to live with it. Governments around the world issue statements. Trade continues. Hong Kong did not fall quietly, it was pushed. And those responsible should be named, sanctioned, isolated, and remembered. Not rewarded with visas, honours, or diplomatic smiles.

I write as someone who has paid a price for refusing to be silent. I write as someone who cannot go home, not because I committed a crime, but because I refused to accept a lie. I write as someone who still believes that international pressure matters, that solidarity matters, that truth still has weight.

Dear Hong Kong,

I love you enough to tell the truth about what you have become.

I love you enough to fight for the people still inside you.

And I will not stop.

Not until prisoners are free.

Not until memory is restored.

Not until your name no longer needs defending.

/Chloe Cheung

Three Books That Made an Impact

我不是細路:十八前後 I Am Not a Child: Before and After Eighteen By Joshua Wong

Reading this book felt like looking straight into a mirror of my own activism. Joshua’s words are raw, unfiltered and painfully honest: the fear, the hope, the confusion of being so young, yet feeling compelled to stand up when everything around you feels unjust. He writes as a teenager whose heart pounds with the same doubts and dreams I’ve carried. The friends lost to politics, the heaviness of state pressure, the guilt of growing up too fast — all of it resonated with me deeply.

In Hong Kong today, this book has vanished from all public shelves. It has been withdrawn under censorship linked to the national security law, silencing the story of a generation of young voices who dared to demand justice and stand up for freedom.

謙卑的奮鬥 Humble Struggle By Albert Ho

Reading this book, I saw that Albert Ho’s life is a testament to devotion — from defending the vulnerable as a human rights lawyer, to leading the pro-democracy movement, to standing up for justice on the streets and in the courts.

Every chapter reflects his deep care for the people and the city he calls home. What struck me most was how profoundly he loves Hong Kong, and how the city he cherishes has repeatedly punished him for that love. Ho has faced repeated threats, physical attacks, and now imprisonment simply for dedicating his life to human rights and democracy. I felt both humbled and inspired, reminded that activism is about staying true to your principles even when the state turns against you.

Ho is now on trial, accused of inciting others to subvert state power under the National Security Law, facing a maximum sentence of up to ten years in prison.

左右大局 The Tipping Point By Li Wei-ling

Through Li Wei‑Ling’s eyes, I could feel the weight that journalists carry every day even back in 2014: the censorship, the self-censorship, the constant threats, and the unbearable tension between telling the truth and simply surviving in a city where speaking out can be dangerous.

What struck me most was how even the simplest act of reporting becomes an act of courage. Every story she told, every programme she produced, was more than news, it was a stand for transparency, accountability, and the public’s right to know.

Reading it now, I feel an even deeper pang. What was already a perilous environment back then has only worsened. Today, Hong Kong’s pro-democracy media outlets have all been shut down, voices silenced, and spaces for independent reporting nearly erased.

Like what you read?

Take action for freedom of expression and donate to PEN/Opp. Our work depends upon funding and donors. Every contribution, big or small, is valuable for us.

Donate on Patreon
More ways to get involved

Search